Life As We Knew It

Title: Life As We Knew It
Author: Susan Beth Pfeffer
Publisher: Harcourt Children's Books
Copyright: 2006
ISBN: 0152058265


Written in diary form, Life As We Knew It chronicles teen girl Miranda and her family in the days following a meteor's crash into the moon. Because the moon is hit so hard, it is knocked out of it's orbit and begins to cause many catastrophic events on earth- namely tsunamis, earthquakes, and volcanos. Miranda and her family live in rural Pennsylvania, far enough away from all of the major happenings, yet they are still affected. They must ration food, water, and gas to survive, going for months without electricity. This is an interesting book about one woman's idea of what the world might look like in the event of a natural disaster of catastrophic proportions.

Generally I only review books on this website that I find enjoyable. I am taking a break from that practice to bring you my thoughts on Life As We Knew It. Let me say up front that I found the story interesting. It held my attention throughout the book. The character development was decent and I found myself caring about what happened to Miranda, her family, and friends. The concept was intriguing as well. In the science fiction genre, we often hear about meteors hitting earth or aliens invading and causing epic catastrophe (or better yet being spared by Will Smith,) but I've never given any thought to how a disaster on the moon could affect us here on Earth. In that respect it was original and interesting. I'm not sure how scientific any of this is, but it doesn't really matter, because it's fiction. Because of the interesting plot and solid character development, I'm tempted to read the next two companion books, but because of what I am about to discuss, I'm just not sure if I can.

My problems with the book far outweigh the things I liked about. To be frank, this book seemed nothing more than a platform for Pfeffer to present her political and religious views. I don't believe it is ever appropriate to use a work of fiction in this manner, but especially not a book written for teens! They are still children and do not need the opinions of one jaded author coloring their beliefs. (While this book is considered Young Adult, School Library Journal categorizes it as being appropriate for grades six through eight!) It is very obvious that the author has a problem with Christians. Prior to the meteor crash, Miranda's best friend turns to Christianity to deal with the death of another of their good friends. The minister in the church she attends is portrayed as a sneaky, hypocritical brainwasher and his followers are made out to be kooks. Regardless of one's religious standpoint, I think most would agree that the way she portrayed Christians was completely unnecessary. I actually read a review from an Atheist on amazon.com who said she felt the treatment of Christianity in this book was absolutely unacceptable. Had the story been about an evil Jewish rabbi and his crazy followers, I doubt it would've made it past the editors.

Even if one could overlook the anti-Christian aspect of the novel, it would be impossible to overlook the bias she has against former president George W. Bush. Although fiction, it is obvious that he is who she is referring to when making statements (through Miranda's mother) about how stupid he is, what an idiot he is, etc. At one point she talks about how the president took all of his friends and all the food and went to his ranch in Texas. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out she's not talking about Bill Clinton. While I am less concerned with her political viewpoints being shared than I am about her religious viewpoints, I still feel it is unnecessary to the story and quite inappropriate for children's literature. Most of the kids reading this book aren't even of voting age!

While I would offer this book as well as it's companions on age-appropriate library shelves, I would never recommend this book to anyone at all, much less teenagers. Because of the fact that I wouldn't want my children reading this book, I could not with good conscience use this book in a lesson unless I was teaching about prejudice or bias. This book would definitely be a good example for that!